← Search

Gary Farrar

MANAKIN SABOT, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 34W–19L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Gary Farrar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-07-18 · TDC Shafer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Grant Slegowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · TDC Shafer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Hermitage Slegowski · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Politowicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · Hermitage Slegowski · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rafael Lugo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · Hermitage Slegowski · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · Hermitage Slegowski · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Furbee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Charles Wayland / Michael Freeman
2026-05-19 · Hermitage Slegowski · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mac Stuckey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-08 · Hermitage Slegowski · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Hermitage Slegowski · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-27 · TDC Shafer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-07-20 · TDC Shafer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Cappellino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
71%
22W–9L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe