← Search

Lisa Wallace

— year-end
45 matches · 19W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lisa Wallace to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-02-20 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Matise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-02-13 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Gasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-02-05 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-22 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Copley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-09 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-29 · Royal Oaks/Copley W.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pressley Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-14 · Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Peticolas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 51.6% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 40.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer