← Search

Rekha Narahari

— year-end
30 matches · 9W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rekha Narahari to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-06-01 · Royal Oaks - Power Players · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Eyberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-06 · Royal Oaks - Power Players · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Pedemonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-18 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Frey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-17 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noemi Ibarrola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-11-11 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Catherine Urban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-04 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noemi Ibarrola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-21 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andee Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-07 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniela Ritsco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-30 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rita Sleiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-23 · Royal Oaks - Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniela Ritsco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amani Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amani Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.7% of games
3.5
13%
3W–20L · 29.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#4 Singles
13%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova