← Search

Lisa Hayslip-Leo

— year-end
152 matches · 110W–42L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Lisa Hayslip-Leo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2022-12-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Castoro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2022-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Castoro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2022-10-11 · #1 Female Doubles · with Kim Ulrey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2022-08-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Ulrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Sommers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2022-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Torrie Kline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Meg Evans-Gartley / Sarah Wascura
2022-07-20 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Ulrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Torrie Kline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Castoro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Diane Babbitt / Scarlett Spence
2022-07-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Ulrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Susan Miller / Christine Peterson
2022-07-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Ulrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Janet JenningsOchs / Sharon Miller
2022-06-30 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kim Ulrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams17 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
8W–0L · 70.8% of games
3.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 62.6% of games
4.0
64%
16W–9L · 55.8% of games
7.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.4% of games
8.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova