← Search

Megann Rundell

Greenwood Village, CO
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
63 matches · 28W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megann Rundell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-08-06 · SS-LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maren Plisko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · HG RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Landen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Landen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · SS-H RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim MacKendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · HG RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · SS-H RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cody Sherrod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · HG TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Dimig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-18 · HG TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Dimig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · SS-H RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim MacKendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-07-18 · HFII GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Schweiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 45.5% of games
4.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer