← Search

Joy Coulter-Brown

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 124W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joy Coulter-Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
W
2026-07-21 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Misner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · LTFC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Hodous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-05 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grant Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · LTFC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grant Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · LTFC PINK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Franciscus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-10 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Pursell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Will Beutelschies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games
3.5
64.6%
82W–45L · 53.3% of games
4.0
35.7%
15W–27L · 45.3% of games
7.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.1% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.3% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
137 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams