← Search

Melinda French

— year-end
176 matches · 97W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Melinda French to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Chiao, Denise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Kelsey Corken / Kristi Hansen - *
2026-07-22 · Chiao, Denise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Heineman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Valdez, Kelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Hilbrands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-18 · Valdez, Kelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-12 · Evans, Keri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-28 · Evans, Keri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Heineman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Micah Schloegel / Sarah Ross
2025-09-10 · Chiao, Denise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.3% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.4%
83W–44L · 55.2% of games
4.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 28.9% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe