← Search

Karina Hoffmann

— year-end
144 matches · 68W–76L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Karina Hoffmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-09-13 · McDermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Mcdermed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-6
W
2026-06-15 · Mcdermed, Angie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Mcdermed, Angie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Stenslie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-18 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Muir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Mcdermed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · McDermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Acosta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Muir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-06 · McDermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-25 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Muir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-23 · McDermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Trenkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-11 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Muir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-23 · Blackwell, Tiffany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Fike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 53.8% of games
4.0
41.1%
37W–53L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams