Cheryl O'Neill
Fairhope, AL
76 matches · 51W–25L · seasons 2024–2027
Captains: add Cheryl O'Neill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history76 matches
W
Susan Smith / Catherine Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Fairhope - Crowley/Bailey 4.0
Fairhope - Bailey 55+
Fairhope - Volnoff/Bailey 55+
MTC - Loris/Wilson
Fairhope - Crowley/Bailey 4.0
Fairhope - Bailey 55+
Fairhope - Crowley/Bailey 4.0
Fairhope - Crowley:Bailey 4.0
Fairhope - Volnoff/Bailey 55+
Fairhope - Volnoff/Bailey 55+
MFTC Fun Team
MO - Bailey 55+
MO - Crowley/Bailey 3.5
MO - Crowley/Bailey 3.5
MO - Pennington 3.5
MTC - Loris/Wilson
MTC - Wilson/Loris
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
72.2%
26W–10L · 57% of games
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 49.5% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 54.7% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.