← Search

Mindi Welford

— year-end
68 matches · 40W–28L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Mindi Welford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-08 · CCM - Smith 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonya Gomel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · CCM - Meador 3.5 N · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen LaCour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · CCM - Smith 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicky Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · CCM - Smith 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Wing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-24 · CCM - Meador/LaCour 4.0 D · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brantley Perloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · CCM - Meador/LaCour 4.0 D · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-17 · CCM - Meador/LaCour 4.0 D · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gayle Zieman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · CCM - Tulowitzki · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Starr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · CCM - Tulowitzki · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Cowart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-01 · CCM - Tulowitzki · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Starr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-04 · MO - Boudreaux/Tulowitzki · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · MO - Boudreaux/Tulowitzki · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Jean Tulowitzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.4% of games
3.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 50.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
15W–5L · 59.5% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer