← Search

Ken Proc

Evergreen, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 56W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ken Proc to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-08-25 · MVCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · MVCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · MVCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Donald Ligrani / Steve Brown
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Vogelsang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Vogelsang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Alec Wynne / Edward Hynek
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Vogelsang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · MC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · MC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-23 · MC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Loomis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · MC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · MC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · LTC-M NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Vogelsang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
72.4%
42W–16L · 57.3% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 46.2% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 75% of the time
#1 Doubles
75%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova