← Search

Sasha Shepard

Arvada, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 71W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sasha Shepard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-08-25 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Manzolillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Rose Wilder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kellyn Goeken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Girish Nair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Steffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · NJ NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Rose Wilder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Bonczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · NJ YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Richker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-05 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with April Kobayashi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · NJ YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Steffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Hofstra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ursula Hamel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 67.4% of games
3.5
34.3%
12W–23L · 45.3% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 58.6% of games
6.5mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.4% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Male Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer