← Search

Denise Giannone

Moorestown, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 139W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Giannone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Horne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-11 · Locked and Loaded · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kendria McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kelli Bretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · Locked and Loaded · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kelli Bretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · Pennsbury Players · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Galto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Frog GOld · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberlee Sommar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-31 · Frog GOld · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mindy Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · MissionBay/Levine · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hermine Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · MissionBay/Levine · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marie Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-04 · NJD: Chester Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-15 · Team Favia · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hearn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.2%
87W–37L · 58% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 37.5% of games
8.0
75%
24W–8L · 58.5% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova