← Search

Minako Kobayashi

Chadds Ford, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 115W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Minako Kobayashi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Rock Paper Scissors · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomiko Saito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · 55 and Foxy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomiko Saito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · 55 and Foxy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomiko Saito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Tina Baczkowski / Yvonne Schappell
2026-08-02 · 55 and Foxy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · 55 and Foxy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Parcells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · Rock Paper Scissors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomiko Saito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Carolyn Strong / Laurie Black
2026-07-17 · 55 and Foxy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Maund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · 55 and Foxy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomiko Saito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-19 · Dupont Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Susan Stipa / Yvonne Schappell
2026-05-18 · 55 and Foxy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tomiko Saito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · Dupont Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Reardon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · TA 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63.2%
60W–35L · 55.5% of games
8.0
80.6%
25W–6L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 54.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova