Rachel Riegel
90 matches · 42W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Rachel Riegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history90 matches
L
Becky Seybert / Leslie Smulyan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Libby Edwards / Christie Millis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Karen Roberts / Haley Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Elena Ordas / Claudia Manzur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
45.2%
38W–46L · 49.3% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
22%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.