← Search

Rachel Hazen

— year-end
24 matches · 14W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rachel Hazen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2025-10-28 · MTC - Simmons · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-10-14 · MTC - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-07 · MTC - Paquin/Clay · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Summer Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Allie Pipkins / Alex Gressett
2025-07-17 · MTC - Simmons/Rapoza · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hayley Carlton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-10 · MTC - Simmons/Rapoza · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-09 · MTC - Simmons/Rapoza · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rebecca Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-02 · MTC - Simmons/Rapoza · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rebecca Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-03-18 · MTC - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-03-11 · MTC - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melinda Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-04 · MTC - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-01-15 · MTC - Paquin/Clay · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Summer Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-10-29 · MTC Simmons/Rapoza · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Belter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 44.1% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova