← Search

Susan Novitsky

Savoy, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 76W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Novitsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-09-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
Karen Disharoon / Heidi Maurer
2026-08-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renee Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Winder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Karen Disharoon / Heidi Maurer
2026-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ann Royse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Sarah Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Soderlind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Crist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
28.9%
22W–54L · 42% of games
7.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.4% of games
7.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 55.7% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.5% of games
7.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
48 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams