← Search

Colleen Curran

Bloomington, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 59W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colleen Curran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
Sarah Kim / Susan Novitsky
2026-09-02 · MSIL A55&O 8.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lucinda Uphoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · MSIL A55&O 8.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Becky Wiese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Wiese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Immen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Wiese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Immen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-1
L
2026-03-10 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-24 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane McKillen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-13 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-01 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Owen-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-05 · MSIL A65&O 7.0W Owen-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-08-22 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Rebholz-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darla Bruder-Goodlick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 56.5% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 50% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 37% of games
8.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.6% of games
9.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 70.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova