← Search

Lee Lemay

Tallahassee, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 45W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lee Lemay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Bush · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Taniwa Ndebele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-03 · Bush · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Jaindl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Chansamone Bryant championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Chansamone Bryant championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Robyn Wainner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Bush · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chansamone Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-18 · Flint River/Matthew Hilliard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Curry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Joe McGlincy / Niki Cox
2026-07-12 · Camilla/Shiver · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edmund Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Bush · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Jaindl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Bush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chansamone Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
Neil Howell / Catherine Reid
2026-06-27 · Flint River/Matthew Hilliard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edmund Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · Bush · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Taniwa Ndebele mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
59%
23W–16L · 52.8% of games
4.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.7% of games
6.5
0%
0W–7L · 29.2% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.4% of games
7.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert