← Search

Pia Lehtonen

— year-end
152 matches · 87W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Pia Lehtonen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Lehtonen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harsha Panasa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · #4 Doubles · with Anna Jones championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Franson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · Lehtonen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harsha Panasa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · LEON/Morgan-Gates · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · LEON/Morgan-Gates · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Beggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-14 · LEON/Morgan-Gates · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Beggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Melissa Johnson / Jennifer Kjellerup
2026-03-12 · Leon/Warner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Franson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-19 · Leon/Warner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Franson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
Rhonda Tullos / Anna Lee
2026-02-12 · Leon/Warner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Franson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Anna Lee / Tiffany Jones
2026-02-05 · Leon/Warner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · with Robyn Wainner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 69.1% of games
4.0
58.3%
21W–15L · 53.1% of games
7.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 56.7% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 64.9% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams