← Search

Beth Packard

Cornelius, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 82W–157L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Packard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history239 matches
L
2026-09-07 · LAMA-Marin/Bailey 18s 6.5 Wed pm · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeannie Cassarino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-31 · LABA-Bates/LNRSC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · LABA-Bates/LNRSC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jana Watt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-17 · LJHI-Higgins/Bailey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Pickup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · LABA-Bates/LNRSC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jana Watt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · MLJRI-Ritter/Bailey 3.5 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · TLKBE-Benz-King/BAILEY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-27 · TLHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton LKN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-14 · MLJRI-Ritter/Bailey 3.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Reiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · TLHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton LKN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Hebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-02 · TLKBE-Benz-King/BAILEY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · MLJRI-Ritter/Bailey 3.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
40.9%
45W–65L · 46.9% of games
4.0
19.1%
9W–38L · 34.8% of games
6.5
39.4%
13W–20L · 46.7% of games
7.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 35.9% of games
3.5mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
66 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe