← Search

Bridgett Dedmond

Stanley, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 103W–73L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Bridgett Dedmond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-09-10 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Karner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-27 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katelyn Goodnough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennie Carruth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Karner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · LKBD-Dedmond/Westport · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Karner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-17 · LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Karner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · TLBDE-Dedmond/CSD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathalie Naslund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · MLKGO-Goodnough/Westport · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aiden Orr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · TLCRI-Richards/CSD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Japec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · TLBDE-Dedmond/Westport · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Trask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · MLKGO-Goodnough/Westport · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Simonetti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · MLKGO-Goodnough/Westport · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aiden Orr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
50%
7W–7L · 51.1% of games
3.5
51.1%
24W–23L · 49.6% of games
4.0
63%
17W–10L · 55.3% of games
5.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 54.2% of games
7.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 59.1% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 68.2% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer