← Search

Susan Edison

— year-end
67 matches · 22W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Edison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeanie Chon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mi Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-29 · Elysium 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-22 · Elysium 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Dye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Diane Zieg / Alison Scott
2024-11-07 · Elysium 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanie Chon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
L
Joy Hale / Pamela Smith
2024-10-17 · Elysium 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mi Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-09-27 · Elysium 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mi Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-04-15 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-12-08 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Hazelbaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-12-01 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Bisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-11-17 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2023-10-20 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.2% of games
3.5
21.9%
7W–25L · 39.5% of games
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
15%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams