← Search

Diane Crawford

Westerville, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
369 matches · 190W–179L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diane Crawford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history369 matches
W
Christina Kulesa / Sarah Edwards
2026-07-29 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frieda Hoheisel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Sherwood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Leslie Wilson / Jennifer Murphy
2026-07-01 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Pawlarczyk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracey Riffle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-3
L
2026-05-18 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Goodman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-08 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Headings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Quinlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-10 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Headings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Kington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-2
W
2026-03-29 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gena Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Quinlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
56.2%
108W–84L · 52.1% of games
4.0
25.7%
18W–52L · 40.3% of games
6.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.4% of games
7.0
60%
18W–12L · 55% of games
7.5
56.8%
25W–19L · 52.6% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
74 matches
#2 Singles
9%
32 matches
#1 Singles
8%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal