← Search

Brian Lauder

Lexington, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 69W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brian Lauder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-07-17 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lana Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Ravencraft mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Francisco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-23 · KY/LEX/Lauder/Howard · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-03 · KY/LEX/Lauder/Howard · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with J Peter Cassidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-08-25 · KY/LEX/Lauder/Howard · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randall Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-08-03 · KY/LEX/Cassagne/Miller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Ravencraft mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-14 · KY/LEX/Cassagne/Miller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Brester mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-27 · KY/LEX/Cassagne/Miller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Hixson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-17 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Lykins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-14 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nickels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Jeff Brown / Alberto Rondon
2025-04-12 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
78.1%
25W–7L · 59% of games
4.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 58.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.9% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.1% of games
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe