← Search

Lana Stephens

— year-end
58 matches · 30W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lana Stephens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-07-17 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Lauder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Cassagne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · KY/LEX/Francisco/Cassagne/Barroso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Hutchens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-03 · KY/LEX/Morrow/Parrish/Miller · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Brunner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-30 · KY/LEX/Wickline · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Grissom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · KY/LEX/Miller/Hixson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elisabeth Hixson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-26 · KY/LEX/Ravencraft/Miller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · KY/LEX/Ravencraft/Miller · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-16 · KY/LEX/Ravencraft/Miller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marisol Valles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-11 · KY/LEX/Ravencraft/Miller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connie Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-07 · KY/LEX/Ravencraft/Miller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Georgeanna Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 59.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–10L · 29.2% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova