← Search

Danielle D'Amico

San Clemente, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 91W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle D'Amico to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
Daniela Chung / Jennifer Lee
2026-08-22 · OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Tristen Nugent championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · OC LNRC - Avi - Sun1030 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Avinash Mehta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · OC Monarch Butterflies - Elyz · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Valentina Stepanova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Gagnon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
Quynh Tran / Cassidee Nguyen
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Archibald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · OC LLW LPC - Blanco · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-23 · OC LLW LPC - Blanco · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thanh-Yen Doan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
85.4%
41W–7L · 62.3% of games
5.0
25%
6W–18L · 38.9% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 63.8% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.4% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer