← Search

Chloe Kishel

Signal Hill, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 60W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Chloe Kishel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-08-22 · OC Irvine LPC - Lisa - Sat9 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vandana Kadiamada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
L
2026-08-19 · BC-MiraCosta/TracyCostantino · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Reyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · BC-MiraCosta/TracyCostantino · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Quan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · OC Irvine LPC - Lisa - Sat9 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · OC Irvine LPC - Lisa - Sat9 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vandana Kadiamada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · BC-MiraCosta/TracyCostantino · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Quan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-20 · OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen - Sat9 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · BC-BJK/ChikaTaylor · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen - Sat9 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · BC-BJK/ChikaTaylor · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen - Sat9 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · BC-BJK/ChikaTaylor · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 63.9% of games
4.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 64.6% of games
4.5
38.7%
12W–19L · 44.3% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#1 Singles
22%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert