← Search

Amanda Dye

Columbia, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 58W–8L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amanda Dye to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-09-03 · LATA18/Meyers/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madeleine Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · LATA18/Meyers/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Conwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Groves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Stier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Cydney Donnelly / Chris Collins
2026-06-29 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Stier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawson Thornton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-19 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-12 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-19 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-12 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginger Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 98% of games
3.0
100%
17W–0L · 82% of games
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 72.5% of games
4.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 68.5% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.9% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#1 Singles
24%
16 matches
#2 Singles
17%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert