← Search

Cecilia Depret-Bixio

Columbia, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 78W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cecilia Depret-Bixio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-09-03 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Raine Cherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Steck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Steck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · LATA18/Zupon/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Stitely mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · CTL18/KITOWICZ/WRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Kitowicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · LATA18/Zupon/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Sanders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-30 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raine Cherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · CTL18/KITOWICZ/WRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Kitowicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · CTL (A) 4.0W 18 & Over (Raynor) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Zupon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
95%
19W–1L · 77.7% of games
3.5
87.5%
28W–4L · 63% of games
4.0
54.3%
19W–16L · 52.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.7% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.9% of games
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#2 Singles
20%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams