← Search

Meghan Hegberg

Glenwood Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 60W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meghan Hegberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-09-09 · AG BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lily Freiborg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-24 · AG BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · AG BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Zalinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · BASALT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · GSCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Zalinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-23 · GSCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gurvinder Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · GSCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-17 · BASALT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Riddel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · GSCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · GSCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · GSCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brady Emens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · BASALT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
52.4%
55W–50L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer