← Search

Carla Ostberg

Carbondale, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 140W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carla Ostberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
W
2026-09-11 · RVR RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Herreid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · CROWN RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mak Keeling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · RVR GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Herreid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · RVR RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audrey Imhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · RVR GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Makenzie Eshelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · RVR RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Filiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-13 · CROWN RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steve Ostberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-30 · CROWN RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steve Ostberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-24 · RVR RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Herreid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · CROWN RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Terkun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · RVR RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Herreid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-13 · RVR GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Makenzie Eshelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 66.5% of games
3.0
72.3%
68W–26L · 60.3% of games
3.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.1% of games
6.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.8% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.6% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
40 matches
#1 Singles
13%
26 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams