← Search

Julie van Voorhis

— year-end
64 matches · 45W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie van Voorhis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-06-28 · PVIC - Cleek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Bell Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-1
L
2026-06-10 · PVIC - Egan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather LaPrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · PVIC - Egan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Cleek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-08-27 · PVIC - Egan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Suzanne Brulte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-22 · PVIC - Egan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Addison Crenshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-07-12 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Bell Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-06-16 · PVIC - Egan · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Donna Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-1
L
2025-06-14 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Baggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-13 · PVIC - Egan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Schuchart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-05-25 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Bell Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-24 · PVIC - Cleek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Bell Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
73%
27W–10L · 58.3% of games
8.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.5% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert