← Search

Julie Lazer

Owings Mills, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 30W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Julie Lazer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-13 · DaRosso - Matties’ Baddies · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Furst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
Tariq Habash / Ruth Seaborne
2026-09-08 · DaRosso - Matties' Baddies · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Frazier Springfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngs - HighTri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alison Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · DaRosso - Matties' Baddies · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Koby Bonta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · DaRosso - Matties’ Baddies · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Furst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · DaRosso - Matties' Baddies · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Mitchell Furst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · Tetrault - Invisible sTRIngs - HighTri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Gurney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · DaRosso - Matties’ Baddies · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Furst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · DaRosso - Matties’ Baddies · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Furst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Sipocz · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Elizabeth McCann / Heather Carr
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Martinez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 68.7% of games
8.5mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 53.2% of games
9.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 38.6% of games
9.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams