← Search

Heather Carr

Arlington, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 108W–61L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Heather Carr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Team 1 McCann · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelley Regan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Team 1 McCann · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Selma Kikic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Feldman - Triple the Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth McCann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth McCann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Malini Sekhar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Feldman - Triple the Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Feldman - Triple the Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Simone Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Kelley Cantrell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Malini Sekhar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Feldman - Triple the Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jan Neumann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
74.6%
44W–15L · 62.8% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 49.4% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
63.6%
28W–16L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova