← Search

Jennifer Wu

Dayton, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
354 matches · 204W–150L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Wu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history354 matches
W
Susan Smith / Alicia Schneider
2026-07-21 · KTC-McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Taphorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · KTC-Witting · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · KTC-McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Schwing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · QRRC-Stevens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Jain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · QRRC-Stevens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Haack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · KTC-Witting · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · KTC-McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly McNeil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · QRRC-Stevens · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Pierce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Stephanie Buchanan
2026-05-30 · KTC-Witting · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · KTC-McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donna McClanahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-23 · KTC-Witting · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Amanda Casey
2026-05-17 · KTC-Witting · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
73.3%
148W–54L · 60.5% of games
4.0
35.4%
28W–51L · 44.2% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 39.3% of games
7.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
21.7%
5W–18L · 39.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
178 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
34 matches
#2 Singles
8%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe