← Search

Natalie Zimberg

— year-end
49 matches · 29W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Natalie Zimberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Torrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Torrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Torrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · Ossman/WarrickNashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-11-13 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Veronica Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-23 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Torrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-20 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Spirrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Cindy Mccullough / Sarah Green
2025-10-13 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Overby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-29 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Veronica Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-09-20 · Green/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-08-27 · Green/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Marie Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-09 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hailey Hirst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
4.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 50.7% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer