← Search

Elizabeth Csernovicz

Nashville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 47W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Csernovicz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Walker/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Walker/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joy Murphey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Lang/ Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-26 · Walker/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Lester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Lang/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vonda Darr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kylie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vonda Darr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Feyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
96.8%
30W–1L · 69.5% of games
4.5
33.3%
10W–20L · 43.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.4% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.3% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova