← Search

Angela Yeatts

Flora, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 33W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angela Yeatts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Sims, Ginny · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Polly Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · Sims, Ginny · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynnice Limbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Pace, Phillip · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Dotson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · Pace, Phillip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tommy Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Pace, Phillip · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tommy Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Pace, Phillip · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Merchant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-14 · Noland, Beth · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-13 · Trigg, Anita · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-07 · Noland, Beth · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Summer Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Teri Norton / Nancy Miller
2025-10-05 · Trigg, Anita · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joycelynn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-30 · Noland, Beth · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-09-23 · Noland, Beth · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Noland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 25% of games
6.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.9% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.5% of games
3.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova