← Search

Beth Noland

— year-end
88 matches · 50W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Beth Noland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Webb, Jill · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sage Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · Webb, Jill · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sage Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Ruhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brandi Hyatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-25 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Ruhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-02 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Ruhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Ashley Smith / Catherine Stoltzfus
2026-05-19 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tina Fulcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Whitney Mays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-05 · Shukla, Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tina Fulcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbie Heckenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-10 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.5% of games
3.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 57.2% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 46.7% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.7% of games
6.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert