← Search

Holly Tucker-Vance

Knoxville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 33W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Holly Tucker-Vance to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
Jennifer Bell / Jill Stamper
2026-09-01 · Kirby/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Barger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · Johnson/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Saty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · Fields/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-18 · Kirby4.0 18+/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Barger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-17 · Fields/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lea Ann Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-13 · Kirby4.0 18+/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Mcclain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-03 · Fields/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-23 · Kirby4.0 18+/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Barger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-07 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-10 · Gardner/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-11 · Kirby/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay McNabb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-04 · Kirby/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Barger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
66%
31W–16L · 54.1% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.6% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer