← Search

MARISA GRAHAM

— year-end
47 matches · 34W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add MARISA GRAHAM to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
Austin Dang / Julia Slagle
2026-07-21 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Baylor Anders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
Jason Brown / Laura Wolfe
2026-07-11 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
Vittorio Badalassi / Natalie Harrison
2026-07-10 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Osborne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quinn Epperly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Osborne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-18 · Douglas/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Stacey Bristow / Cheryl Cooper
2026-05-04 · Douglas/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with HAILEY NEDS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-13 · Douglas/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Marissa Turner / Jennifer Johnson
2026-03-30 · Douglas/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · Douglas/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tori Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-27 · Unger/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Upshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · Unger/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with HAILEY NEDS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 52.5% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.9% of games
4.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer