← Search

Brent Henning

Jacksonville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 24W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Brent Henning to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
Brian Smith / Tyler Scherr
2026-09-12 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Moret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-22 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Moret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · FYC - Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alex Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · FYC - Hawkins · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karl Greiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jason Moret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Moret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Andy Culver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Andy Culver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · FYC - Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frank Morreale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 58.3% of games
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.4% of games
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.4% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams