← Search

James Racine

Jacksonville, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add James Racine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
Brian Smith / Tyler Scherr
2026-09-12 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brent Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with JD Reeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · FYC - Racine · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brent Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Carlos Rodriguez / Michael Paolicelli
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with John Kashmanian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Joseph Tegenkamp / ChanD Tegenkamp
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Steve Vansandt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brent Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · FYC - Racine · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with JD Reeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · FYC - Racine · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Chewning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · FYC - Racine · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with JD Reeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · FYC - Racine · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Merritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · FYC - Racine · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ryan Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.9% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova