Michelle Hare
160 matches · 101W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Michelle Hare to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history160 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
68.2%
88W–41L · 56.7% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
35%
7W–13L · 45.2% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Singles
18%
29 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.