← Search

Jacalyn Petersen

Fort Collins, CO
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
122 matches · 76W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacalyn Petersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-07-31 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcia Stauter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcia Stauter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Marcia Stauter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Julie Schindler / Lynn Tartell
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Marcia Stauter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Marcia Stauter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-02 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Yabroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · LT WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lora Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-22 · LT WHITE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lora Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · LT WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcia Stauter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · LT WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.3%
41W–19L · 56.4% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
59.2%
29W–20L · 56.7% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams