← Search

Debra Olson

Laramie, WY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 21W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-08-14 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Beth Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Beth Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Stechman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-17 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sherri Wera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · Team Wyo 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angelika Bridgmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Team Wyo 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pennie Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Team Wyo 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angelika Bridgmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · WYO NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sherri Wera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maka Hammock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · WYO NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
L
2026-05-20 · WYO NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheri Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0%
0W–10L · 34.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.6% of games
7.0
24.6%
15W–46L · 40.7% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova