← Search

Gina Hagopian

Lakewood Ranch, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 72W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Gina Hagopian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-08-20 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · LWR Boylston Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan McAloon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carol Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-26 · LWR McAloon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · LWR McAloon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Feingold Navas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-12 · LWR Hagopian · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheila Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Abigail Stephens / Beth Barrett
2026-03-05 · LWR Hagopian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-28 · LWR Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Goelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · LWR Hagopian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martina Kralickova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Karen Adams / Vickie Miller
2026-02-18 · LWR Hagopian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheila Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · LWR Nicholson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Bloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-07 · LWR Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Feingold Navas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
80.4%
37W–9L · 58.9% of games
7.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.3% of games
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 55.7% of games
8.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer