← Search

Sally Alford

— year-end
123 matches · 69W–54L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sally Alford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Dalto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Payne Park Wilson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kara Beene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Payne Park Wilson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kara Beene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-10 · Payne Park Wilson Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · Payne Park Wilson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nancy Finman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Ana Areosa / Maureen Thomas
2026-07-23 · Payne Park Wilson · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kara Beene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Payne Park Wilson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kara Beene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Dale Kozicz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · #4 Doubles · with Dale Kozicz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Dale Kozicz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 48.8% of games
8.5
70%
42W–18L · 58.1% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams