← Search

Jill Lees

Canton, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jill Lees to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2025-06-12 · Woodmont - Bishop · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-04 · Woodmont - Bishop · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacee Sylvester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-22 · Woodmont - Bishop · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 3-6
L
2025-03-18 · Woodmont - Cheryl Wallin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Barrineau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Danielle Smith
2025-03-11 · Woodmont - Cheryl Wallin · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-04 · Woodmont - Cheryl Wallin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacee Sylvester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-25 · Woodmont - Cheryl Wallin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Summer Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Jennifer Luker / Christine Brown
2025-02-03 · Woodmont - Cheryl Wallin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacee Sylvester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-16 · Woodmont - Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Jo Anne Di Dio / Monica Rader
2024-06-25 · Woodmont - Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lewandowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-06-18 · Woodmont - Schultz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2022-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Camp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#1 Singles
11%
2 matches
#2 Singles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe